Help Save Diggy: The Ridiculousness of Breed Specific Legislation
Estimated Reading Time: 7 minutes
- Diggy’s story illustrates the impact of breed specific legislation (BSL).
- Public advocacy can challenge and change discriminatory laws.
- BSL often fails to enhance community safety or animal welfare.
- Evidence suggests that behavior, not breed, should dictate dog ownership laws.
- Grassroots movements can lead to legislative reform.
Table of Contents
- The Story of Diggy
- The Broader Issue: Understanding Breed Specific Legislation (BSL)
- Problems and Critiques of BSL
- Scientific and Legal Consensus
- Community and Legal Responses
- Conclusion: Why “Help Save Diggy” Became a Rallying Cry
The Story of Diggy
Diggy, an American Bulldog, was adopted from the Detroit Dog Rescue after spending an arduous 100 days in a shelter. His new owner, Dan Tillery, who documented their companionship on social media, inadvertently thrust Diggy into the spotlight. A simple photo of the pair shared online rapidly went viral, drawing attention not just to Diggy’s adorable face but also to the unjust local ordinances affecting many dogs like him.
Living in Waterford Township, Michigan, Tillery learned that this local government enforced a ban on “pit bull-type” dogs. Authorities claimed that Diggy violated this ordinance based on his appearance, arguing that he resembled the banned breed. Despite veterinary records clearly identifying him as an American Bulldog—variably considered distinct from a pit bull—the local police cited Tillery and threatened to remove Diggy from his new home (source).
Public outcry surged in Diggy’s defense, fueled by a petition and extensive media coverage. Hundreds rallied to support Diggy, demanding that discriminatory breed-specific laws be abolished (source). Relentless advocacy from Diggy’s supporters ultimately led to a judge’s ruling that allowed Diggy to stay with Tillery—a significant victory for the movement against breed discrimination.
Although the Waterford Township ordinance was amended to allow owners to challenge breed classifications after the case, the breed ban itself remained intact (source). Diggy’s story extended beyond his personal plight, evolving into a rallying cry for change across communities affected by similar laws.
The Broader Issue: Understanding Breed Specific Legislation (BSL)
Breed specific legislation refers to laws and ordinances that ban or restrict certain dog breeds, most often targeting those classified as “pit bull-type” dogs. These laws typically focus on a dog’s appearance rather than its behavior or temperament (source).
Problems and Critiques of BSL
- Ineffectiveness: Contrary to popular belief, numerous expert sources, including the CDC and ASPCA, indicate that there is no evidence supporting the notion that breed-specific laws enhance community safety or reduce dog bite incidents (source). BSL is typically grounded in inaccurate visual identification of breeds, especially challenging when dealing with mixed-breed dogs.
- Unfair Outcomes: BSL can often lead to innocent dogs being misidentified and euthanized solely because of their appearance. This misidentification can extend to well-behaved, friendly pets who are removed from loving homes (source).
- Owner Hardship: Responsible pet owners face legal challenges, financial burdens, and housing issues resulting from BSL, even when their dogs have demonstrated no problematic behavior (source).
- Shelter Impact: Dog shelters are particularly affected by BSL, as banning certain breeds makes it significantly harder to adopt out dogs that fit the visual profile of the restricted breeds. As a result, pit bull-type dogs comprise a disproportionate percentage of shelter euthanasia rates (source).
- Public Health Risk: Owners may try to evade detection from authorities, driving them to neglect necessary licenses and veterinary care, which can lead to health crises (source).
- Resource Diversion: Significant resources are often allocated towards the enforcement of breed bans rather than supporting more effective solutions, such as educational programs for pet owners and leash laws (source).
Scientific and Legal Consensus
A growing body of research and opinion—from the CDC, American Veterinary Medical Association (AVMA), ASPCA, Michigan Humane Society, and Best Friends Animal Society—strongly opposes BSL. They argue that behavior, not breed, should dictate legislation surrounding canine ownership. It is emphasized that any dog can bite, and a dog’s behavior largely depends on training, socialization, and management by the owner rather than its genetic pedigree (source).
Community and Legal Responses
The widespread public reaction to the Diggy case not only highlighted the precarious situation faced by many families with “pit bull-type” dogs but also ignited discussions surrounding the efficacy of BSL within communities across the country (source). As a result of grassroots advocacy catalyzed by Diggy’s story, some communities have begun reviewing or revising breed-specific laws.
In Waterford Township, regulatory adjustments were made to permit pet owners to challenge breed classifications, reflecting the public’s desire for equitable legal treatment (source). Furthermore, the case has informed countless advocacy efforts aimed at educating lawmakers and animal welfare organizations about the understanding that legislation should prioritize behavior and owner responsibility over arbitrary breed classification (source).
Conclusion: Why “Help Save Diggy” Became a Rallying Cry
Diggy’s case exemplifies the systemic issues associated with breed specific legislation, as it illustrates how arbitrary and uninformed laws can impact innocent dogs and loving families. The fervent advocacy that arose around his situation—through viral media, petition drives, and community engagement—spotlights the urgent need for evidence-based public safety policies that respect animal welfare. It serves as a reminder that as a society, we must advocate for legislative reform that focuses on responsible pet ownership and dog behavior rather than mere appearance.
By standing together against breed discrimination, we can push for change that allows every dog, regardless of breed, to find a loving home without fear of unjust penalties.
FAQ
What is breed specific legislation (BSL)?
Breed specific legislation (BSL) refers to laws that ban or restrict certain dog breeds based primarily on their appearance.
Why is BSL considered ineffective?
Research indicates that BSL does not enhance community safety or prevent dog bites, and ineffective breed identifications can lead to misclassification.
What are the alternatives to BSL?
Alternatives to BSL include legislation that focuses on dog behavior, responsible ownership, and effective public education about pet management.
How can communities respond to BSL?
Communities can engage in advocacy efforts to reform BSL, promote education about dog behavior, and challenge existing laws through public petitions.
What impact did Diggy’s case have?
Diggy’s case sparked public outcry and advocacy that highlighted the flaws in BSL, leading to legal changes in some communities.
For more pet care tips and guides, visit Pet Blog.